Follow new updates daily on Twitter:

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Collective leadership

A constituent asked me a few days ago why none of the federal parties take a step towards real collective leadership, i.e. why each has a specific one person designated as the party leader. In the opinion of the constituent, collective leadership may be the way to go, as there is a greater chance that each of the members of the collective will appeal to some part of the demographic. Any ideas on this?


  1. I think that voters would have trouble relating to a collective. It's human nature to personalize things.

  2. But what if it's a group of 3-5 individuals?


I greatly appreciate your comments!