Follow new updates daily on Twitter:

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Collective leadership

A constituent asked me a few days ago why none of the federal parties take a step towards real collective leadership, i.e. why each has a specific one person designated as the party leader. In the opinion of the constituent, collective leadership may be the way to go, as there is a greater chance that each of the members of the collective will appeal to some part of the demographic. Any ideas on this?
Posted by at
Labels:

2 comments:

  1. doconnorJune 10, 2010 at 8:23 AM

    I think that voters would have trouble relating to a collective. It's human nature to personalize things.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ArtemJune 10, 2010 at 8:36 AM

    But what if it's a group of 3-5 individuals?

    ReplyDelete

I greatly appreciate your comments!

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)